<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emailing A Proper Christian = Holy Fucking Shit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165</link>
	<description>If Only I Updated More Often, This Might Not Be Shit</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Log</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>Log</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>It's both, to a degree. The Church Structure is more transparently indefensible and obnoxious, but I find the wholesale promotion of faith offensive, too.

It gets a good press, does faith. Almost to the point where it's its own defense. You can't attack someone's faith - it's precious. Faith is set up as the ultimate positive human endeavour, even when it's a misapplied. For example, saying "you've restored my faith in humanity" is bullshit, becuase you're actually saying "you've provided me with tangible evidence that goes against my previously more pessimistic view of humanity". That's not faith. That's reacting to evidence. It's faith stealing a good reputation from secular human kindness.
I suppose my answer is that I don't really mind an individual's faith, as weird as I may find their particular unquestionable beliefs. But I do hate the fact that faith is held up to be an unequivocal good, when all it amounts to is religious spin for "swallowing any counter-intuitive or transparently nonsense shit you're told by someone in the right clothes".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s both, to a degree. The Church Structure is more transparently indefensible and obnoxious, but I find the wholesale promotion of faith offensive, too.</p>
<p>It gets a good press, does faith. Almost to the point where it&#8217;s its own defense. You can&#8217;t attack someone&#8217;s faith - it&#8217;s precious. Faith is set up as the ultimate positive human endeavour, even when it&#8217;s a misapplied. For example, saying &#8220;you&#8217;ve restored my faith in humanity&#8221; is bullshit, becuase you&#8217;re actually saying &#8220;you&#8217;ve provided me with tangible evidence that goes against my previously more pessimistic view of humanity&#8221;. That&#8217;s not faith. That&#8217;s reacting to evidence. It&#8217;s faith stealing a good reputation from secular human kindness.<br />
I suppose my answer is that I don&#8217;t really mind an individual&#8217;s faith, as weird as I may find their particular unquestionable beliefs. But I do hate the fact that faith is held up to be an unequivocal good, when all it amounts to is religious spin for &#8220;swallowing any counter-intuitive or transparently nonsense shit you&#8217;re told by someone in the right clothes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SickONut</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>SickONut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>Log would answer, but obviously, he's too busy fucking your wife.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Log would answer, but obviously, he&#8217;s too busy fucking your wife.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Light</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1626</link>
		<dc:creator>Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1626</guid>
		<description>Log, is it the idea of a persons faith that causes such ire or is it the Church structure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Log, is it the idea of a persons faith that causes such ire or is it the Church structure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobuttocks</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1623</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobuttocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1623</guid>
		<description>I agree. I'm buggered if I can keep this act up for much longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I&#8217;m buggered if I can keep this act up for much longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertdee</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1619</link>
		<dc:creator>robertdee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1619</guid>
		<description>I apologise (gay) for the surly tone. I was very hungover.

The wank helped, though.

Lets get back to pooing and weeing now and calling Brenda a cunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologise (gay) for the surly tone. I was very hungover.</p>
<p>The wank helped, though.</p>
<p>Lets get back to pooing and weeing now and calling Brenda a cunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Log</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1618</link>
		<dc:creator>Log</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1618</guid>
		<description>Well, I'm not really arguing with that. I'm not suggesting that I have the answer, and I never said that religion was the only cause of pain and subjugation. We're tribal cunts, and religion is just one example of that. But that an argument against humanity, not for religion. I originally wrote loads back to this, but when I read through your post for the tenth time, I realised that I didn't really disagree with you. At least, not to the extent where I really want to carry it on.

"Occam's Razor my arse"

Pascal's Wager, my cunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m not really arguing with that. I&#8217;m not suggesting that I have the answer, and I never said that religion was the only cause of pain and subjugation. We&#8217;re tribal cunts, and religion is just one example of that. But that an argument against humanity, not for religion. I originally wrote loads back to this, but when I read through your post for the tenth time, I realised that I didn&#8217;t really disagree with you. At least, not to the extent where I really want to carry it on.</p>
<p>&#8220;Occam&#8217;s Razor my arse&#8221;</p>
<p>Pascal&#8217;s Wager, my cunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertdee</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>robertdee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>Fuck me, this is really irritating me now. I normally stay away from these type of discussions because people generally come across as fucking idiots. No, worse, fucking idiots who think they have found the answer. I will clarify. If you are THAT convinced that your mammalian brain has scientifically and indesputably proven the cause and meaning behind the universe then you should be awarded a fucking nobel prize because NO ONE ELSE has. Well done you. Everything else is just fucking conjecture. Also, if you are of a particular religious bent, don't you realise that what you "believe" in is mythological? This does not make it "false". It makes it allegorical. The nature of myth and religion is that it is a reference to something that is unknowable (at least in the current realm of human understanding). Those of you who think that religion is the cause of all evil in the world, do you really think that terrorism, invasion of other countries, suppression of women, sexual intolerance and all the other stuff that give people power wouldn't happen if you didn't have religion? Come on, they'd just find a "scientific rationale" for it like the nazis did. I DON'T CARE what you believe as long as you don't invade my space with it and have the decency to understand that it is a METAPHOR or personal THEORY for something currently not understood. Not a fucking fact. That includes the atheists too. If you don't understand that your beliefs are as much conjecture as anyone elses, you really haven't thought deep enough about it. Occam's razor, my arse.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to have a wank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck me, this is really irritating me now. I normally stay away from these type of discussions because people generally come across as fucking idiots. No, worse, fucking idiots who think they have found the answer. I will clarify. If you are THAT convinced that your mammalian brain has scientifically and indesputably proven the cause and meaning behind the universe then you should be awarded a fucking nobel prize because NO ONE ELSE has. Well done you. Everything else is just fucking conjecture. Also, if you are of a particular religious bent, don&#8217;t you realise that what you &#8220;believe&#8221; in is mythological? This does not make it &#8220;false&#8221;. It makes it allegorical. The nature of myth and religion is that it is a reference to something that is unknowable (at least in the current realm of human understanding). Those of you who think that religion is the cause of all evil in the world, do you really think that terrorism, invasion of other countries, suppression of women, sexual intolerance and all the other stuff that give people power wouldn&#8217;t happen if you didn&#8217;t have religion? Come on, they&#8217;d just find a &#8220;scientific rationale&#8221; for it like the nazis did. I DON&#8217;T CARE what you believe as long as you don&#8217;t invade my space with it and have the decency to understand that it is a METAPHOR or personal THEORY for something currently not understood. Not a fucking fact. That includes the atheists too. If you don&#8217;t understand that your beliefs are as much conjecture as anyone elses, you really haven&#8217;t thought deep enough about it. Occam&#8217;s razor, my arse.</p>
<p>Now if you&#8217;ll excuse me, I&#8217;m off to have a wank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SickONut</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>SickONut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>I'd just like to highlight a portion of one of NoButtocks comments above.  Here it is:

"Just to clarify - I donâ€™t believe in the biblical God, per se, Iâ€™m more of a pantheist/god-as-part-of-our-own-conscience kinda guy. Not sure which yet; maybe itâ€™s both, or neither."

In what peculiar language, of which peculiar nation, is THAT a clarification?

Perhaps more importantly, the description that you give above is the religious equivalent of vegetarians who eat chicken.  If you're going to do something, do it properly.  This whole "I'm a Christian but I don't believe most of the Bible, and really, I kind of believe in all Gods, but only a bit" schpiel sounds awfully like you just want there to be something big and comforting out there rather than actually believing in it.  Sort of like Lynus' blanket on a cosmic scale.

And bear in mind that this is from someone who has had in depth religious discussions* with Log, where I argued against his cast-iron atheism.



*we shouted drunkenly at each other for 6 hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just like to highlight a portion of one of NoButtocks comments above.  Here it is:</p>
<p>&#8220;Just to clarify - I donâ€™t believe in the biblical God, per se, Iâ€™m more of a pantheist/god-as-part-of-our-own-conscience kinda guy. Not sure which yet; maybe itâ€™s both, or neither.&#8221;</p>
<p>In what peculiar language, of which peculiar nation, is THAT a clarification?</p>
<p>Perhaps more importantly, the description that you give above is the religious equivalent of vegetarians who eat chicken.  If you&#8217;re going to do something, do it properly.  This whole &#8220;I&#8217;m a Christian but I don&#8217;t believe most of the Bible, and really, I kind of believe in all Gods, but only a bit&#8221; schpiel sounds awfully like you just want there to be something big and comforting out there rather than actually believing in it.  Sort of like Lynus&#8217; blanket on a cosmic scale.</p>
<p>And bear in mind that this is from someone who has had in depth religious discussions* with Log, where I argued against his cast-iron atheism.</p>
<p>*we shouted drunkenly at each other for 6 hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertdee</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>robertdee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>How do I post the picture of Roy Barraclough here?

I'm so glad you gave us the opportunity to talk about our spirituality. I'm definitely one of the most spiritual people I know and practice meditation because it keeps me in touch with the sacred nature of all things and helps me lift the karma of others whether they know it or not. I like the colour blue (though all colours are good, vibrationally speaking) and the sound of summer rain on a forest canopy. I welcome people of all races and cultures and would like to help the orphans of an African nation, perhaps with the gift of song. I like to think that the words might provide a kind of nourishment to them that would last longer than a bag of rice. When it comes to sexuality I think we are all pretty much polymorphously perverse and that each human libido is a treasure box of diversity. I am a child of the world and the future is our destiny.

Love is the law, love under will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I post the picture of Roy Barraclough here?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so glad you gave us the opportunity to talk about our spirituality. I&#8217;m definitely one of the most spiritual people I know and practice meditation because it keeps me in touch with the sacred nature of all things and helps me lift the karma of others whether they know it or not. I like the colour blue (though all colours are good, vibrationally speaking) and the sound of summer rain on a forest canopy. I welcome people of all races and cultures and would like to help the orphans of an African nation, perhaps with the gift of song. I like to think that the words might provide a kind of nourishment to them that would last longer than a bag of rice. When it comes to sexuality I think we are all pretty much polymorphously perverse and that each human libido is a treasure box of diversity. I am a child of the world and the future is our destiny.</p>
<p>Love is the law, love under will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Log</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>Log</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>Well, you can't argue with that, I suppose. As much as I'm embarrassed by my own rare sincerity, this is one of the few things I feel passionately about. So back at you with continuing funnyless backwash; first, I bet you've indulged yourself in a rant once or twice, without checking that everyone there gives as much of a toss as you do. And second, it's not the idea of supernaturalists pretending to have the "amazing absolute answer" that bothers me. It's the cocktail of victim mentality, privilege, political power, arrogance, bigotry, violence, hippy new-age bullshit, charitable status, and serene superiority that gets me. At least my sense of superiority has the good manners to be screamingly unstable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you can&#8217;t argue with that, I suppose. As much as I&#8217;m embarrassed by my own rare sincerity, this is one of the few things I feel passionately about. So back at you with continuing funnyless backwash; first, I bet you&#8217;ve indulged yourself in a rant once or twice, without checking that everyone there gives as much of a toss as you do. And second, it&#8217;s not the idea of supernaturalists pretending to have the &#8220;amazing absolute answer&#8221; that bothers me. It&#8217;s the cocktail of victim mentality, privilege, political power, arrogance, bigotry, violence, hippy new-age bullshit, charitable status, and serene superiority that gets me. At least my sense of superiority has the good manners to be screamingly unstable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertdee</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>robertdee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 12:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>I always feel queasily uneasy about evangelical atheists/christians* who feel the need to convince you that they have found the answer and now you must too. Its almost as if they need the certainty of universal belief to make it true. I imagine this is what makes them so intolerant of the beliefs/agnosticism/don't fucking care of others.

*delete as applicable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always feel queasily uneasy about evangelical atheists/christians* who feel the need to convince you that they have found the answer and now you must too. Its almost as if they need the certainty of universal belief to make it true. I imagine this is what makes them so intolerant of the beliefs/agnosticism/don&#8217;t fucking care of others.</p>
<p>*delete as applicable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Log</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>Log</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>If one of the main reasons you like Christianity is because a man did some magic tricks 2,000 years ago, then you really need to see some &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-EygeAcKHw"&gt;modern-day magicians&lt;/a&gt;. As for meditation, I've tried it. Why is it so hard for you to believe that that's not purely internal*? Why do you want so hard to believe that there's something "out there" that you're clutching at - and dropping - straws like a dog with seven dicks? God. No, Jesus. No, not even Jesus. It's SOMETHING.

We're not going to convince each other here, you're right. Just send topless pics and read this excellent book about meditation.

&lt;img src="http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/Meditate_With_Your_Fucking_.jpg" /&gt;

* I suppose you could ask the opposite, why I'm so unwilling to accept an external source of wonder that only appears when you close your eyes and think hard. I just try to explain things in terms I can understand, instead of terms which force me to throw my arms across the room and say "oh, well, I guess that's just plain amazing then".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one of the main reasons you like Christianity is because a man did some magic tricks 2,000 years ago, then you really need to see some <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-EygeAcKHw">modern-day magicians</a>. As for meditation, I&#8217;ve tried it. Why is it so hard for you to believe that that&#8217;s not purely internal*? Why do you want so hard to believe that there&#8217;s something &#8220;out there&#8221; that you&#8217;re clutching at - and dropping - straws like a dog with seven dicks? God. No, Jesus. No, not even Jesus. It&#8217;s SOMETHING.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not going to convince each other here, you&#8217;re right. Just send topless pics and read this excellent book about meditation.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/Meditate_With_Your_Fucking_.jpg" /></p>
<p>* I suppose you could ask the opposite, why I&#8217;m so unwilling to accept an external source of wonder that only appears when you close your eyes and think hard. I just try to explain things in terms I can understand, instead of terms which force me to throw my arms across the room and say &#8220;oh, well, I guess that&#8217;s just plain amazing then&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobuttocks</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobuttocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1606</guid>
		<description>Gah!!! Why did I have to open my big fat jesus-admiring mouth? I must have been feeling beliggerent for some reason.
Though thank you, Log, for engaging in debate rather than telling me to fuck off and hide up the arse of the nearest bishop. I admire your patience &#38; restraint, and I'm sorry for calling you ignorant. 
Just to clarify - I don't believe in the biblical God, per se, I'm more of a pantheist/god-as-part-of-our-own-conscience  kinda guy.  Not sure which yet; maybe it's both, or neither. 
I don't have any proof of the existence of parallel universes, or higher dimensions, either, but I believe in them, too. Even without direct proof, the theories are, to my mind at least, pretty sound.

"You canâ€™t just take Jesus out of the Bible and say he was the one cool thing."

Yes you bloody can!!! The Bible was written over hundreds of years, by different people, in different locations, at different times, each with slighly different myths, legends, and belief systems... and then there's the undeniable fact that text would have become corrupted through translation &#38; bias - perhaps many times over. The Bible is like a "Greatest Hits" album of the theosophical literature around at the time. And, like a greatest hits album, a lot of it's ugly messy dirge. Saying you've got to believe the whole thing is like saying you've got to listen to every track on "Now 44". To put it another way, you don't keep the dirt when panning for gold.

I don't buy the "gods son" thing either, really;- either we're all gods children, or somehow we must earn the right to become one of gods kids. Jesus referred to himself both as "son of god" and "son of man":- i.e. he admits he is just a human. But quite where he learnt those cool powers is a matter of great interest to me... and is one of the main reason I like Christianity. I WANT SUPERPOWERS!!!! And I've had something a 'bit' like them... just not for very long - but then I'm not a very good Christian. 

Whether Jesus even existed is immaterial... even if we take it as read he's a character as fictional as in any other legend, (like... er... theseus or summat) that doesn't affect the wisdom contained in the Bible stories. But hey... I accept that, whatever my arguments, it's all unprovable conjecture on my part; I ask only that, before dismissing all religion as fantastical whimsy, you try meditation.   If THAT doesn't tickle your "there's something else out there" bone, nothing will.

From now on, I promise to not to insult or deride you, Log. I have the utmost respect for your intelligence &#38; humour, and this was clearly the wrong place and method for me to take issue with your religious stance. I will return to being polite, lovely and strange. Susan can put her monocle back in.

Now let us never speak of this again. Forgive me, Log, for I know not what I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gah!!! Why did I have to open my big fat jesus-admiring mouth? I must have been feeling beliggerent for some reason.<br />
Though thank you, Log, for engaging in debate rather than telling me to fuck off and hide up the arse of the nearest bishop. I admire your patience &amp; restraint, and I&#8217;m sorry for calling you ignorant.<br />
Just to clarify - I don&#8217;t believe in the biblical God, per se, I&#8217;m more of a pantheist/god-as-part-of-our-own-conscience  kinda guy.  Not sure which yet; maybe it&#8217;s both, or neither.<br />
I don&#8217;t have any proof of the existence of parallel universes, or higher dimensions, either, but I believe in them, too. Even without direct proof, the theories are, to my mind at least, pretty sound.</p>
<p>&#8220;You canâ€™t just take Jesus out of the Bible and say he was the one cool thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes you bloody can!!! The Bible was written over hundreds of years, by different people, in different locations, at different times, each with slighly different myths, legends, and belief systems&#8230; and then there&#8217;s the undeniable fact that text would have become corrupted through translation &amp; bias - perhaps many times over. The Bible is like a &#8220;Greatest Hits&#8221; album of the theosophical literature around at the time. And, like a greatest hits album, a lot of it&#8217;s ugly messy dirge. Saying you&#8217;ve got to believe the whole thing is like saying you&#8217;ve got to listen to every track on &#8220;Now 44&#8243;. To put it another way, you don&#8217;t keep the dirt when panning for gold.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t buy the &#8220;gods son&#8221; thing either, really;- either we&#8217;re all gods children, or somehow we must earn the right to become one of gods kids. Jesus referred to himself both as &#8220;son of god&#8221; and &#8220;son of man&#8221;:- i.e. he admits he is just a human. But quite where he learnt those cool powers is a matter of great interest to me&#8230; and is one of the main reason I like Christianity. I WANT SUPERPOWERS!!!! And I&#8217;ve had something a &#8216;bit&#8217; like them&#8230; just not for very long - but then I&#8217;m not a very good Christian. </p>
<p>Whether Jesus even existed is immaterial&#8230; even if we take it as read he&#8217;s a character as fictional as in any other legend, (like&#8230; er&#8230; theseus or summat) that doesn&#8217;t affect the wisdom contained in the Bible stories. But hey&#8230; I accept that, whatever my arguments, it&#8217;s all unprovable conjecture on my part; I ask only that, before dismissing all religion as fantastical whimsy, you try meditation.   If THAT doesn&#8217;t tickle your &#8220;there&#8217;s something else out there&#8221; bone, nothing will.</p>
<p>From now on, I promise to not to insult or deride you, Log. I have the utmost respect for your intelligence &amp; humour, and this was clearly the wrong place and method for me to take issue with your religious stance. I will return to being polite, lovely and strange. Susan can put her monocle back in.</p>
<p>Now let us never speak of this again. Forgive me, Log, for I know not what I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedwolf</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>Dangerous ground here folks.

You know the only (probably not the only reason) that Muslims think they're so great is that they have the youngest major religion and therefore anything else that God or his messengers had supposedly said up to that point had been rough drafts of what was to come. According to the Muslims you should consider all other preceding religions as Alpha and Beta releases. You could argue the point with them I guess, but I'm not sure that the words "reason, doubt and liberal" are included in the Koran so you may end up on the business end of a Middle East Party Popper. By which I mean car-bomb.

Fuck ME that was a sweeping generalisation and incredible exercise in stereotyping. Do I win?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dangerous ground here folks.</p>
<p>You know the only (probably not the only reason) that Muslims think they&#8217;re so great is that they have the youngest major religion and therefore anything else that God or his messengers had supposedly said up to that point had been rough drafts of what was to come. According to the Muslims you should consider all other preceding religions as Alpha and Beta releases. You could argue the point with them I guess, but I&#8217;m not sure that the words &#8220;reason, doubt and liberal&#8221; are included in the Koran so you may end up on the business end of a Middle East Party Popper. By which I mean car-bomb.</p>
<p>Fuck ME that was a sweeping generalisation and incredible exercise in stereotyping. Do I win?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan tobacco</title>
		<link>http://blog.disappointment.com/archives/165#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator>susan tobacco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disappointment.com/wordpress/archives/165#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>Oh I wasn't encouraging him,  Logginsofmine,  I was just impressed to see a Christian swearing.

I don't know why it would be startling, but it is. "Hello, I am an x-tian, here is a swear. Minges." 

It just doesn't seem right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I wasn&#8217;t encouraging him,  Logginsofmine,  I was just impressed to see a Christian swearing.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why it would be startling, but it is. &#8220;Hello, I am an x-tian, here is a swear. Minges.&#8221; </p>
<p>It just doesn&#8217;t seem right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
